|
The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the filing of a motion to reopen tolls the running of the voluntary departure.
| Dada v. Keisler | Supreme Court | No. 06-1181 |
| For more information about this case, see the Supreme Court Update. |
| Chedad v. Gonzales | 1st Circuit | No. 05-2782 |
| Muluya v. Gonzales | 1st Circuit | No. 05-1829 |
| Deloso v. Ashcroft | 9th Circuit | No. 02-72317 |
| Muniz v. Ashcroft | 9th Circuit | No. 03-72718 |
| De Martinez v. Ashcroft | 9th Circuit | No. 02-73939 |
| Ugokwe v. Attorney General | 11th Circuit | No. 05-15237 |
The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the courts of appeals have authority to stay the voluntary departure period during court of appeals review.
| Bocova v. Gonzales | 1st Circuit | No. 04-2175 |
| Zazueta-Carillo v. Ashcroft | 9th Circuit | No. 02-1541 |
The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the statutory right to file a motion to reopen must be given effect, despite the bar to relief for overstaying a voluntary departure order.
Bocova v. Gonzales
Chedad v. Gonzales
Muluya v. Gonzales
Deloso v. INS
Muniz v. Ashcroft
Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft
Ugokwe v. Attorney General
|
1st Circuit
1st Circuit
1st Circuit
9th Circuit
9th Circuit
9th Circuit
11th Circuit
|
|
No. 04-2175
No. 05-2782
No. 05-1829
No. 02-72317
No. 03-72718
No. 02-1541
No. 05-15237
|
| 
